Cattle be in Two
Mind States: An Overview of Heat Stress Tolerance in Cattle
Tanveer Hussain1*†,
Qamar Raza Qadri1†, Abdul Wajid2 and Masroor Ellahi Babar3
1Department of
Molecular Biology, Virtual University Pakistan, Rawalpindi,
Pakistan
2Department of
Biotechnology, Virtual University of Pakistan,
Lahore, Pakistan
3University of
Agriculture, Dera Ismail Khan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
*For
correspondence: tanveer.hussain@vu.edu.pk
†Contributed
equally to this work and are co-first authors
Received 17 September 2021; Accepted
25 November 2022; Published 27 January 2023
Abstract
The heat stress stimulated by the
environment is of vital interest as it negatively influences animal
productivity. Therefore, adapting to challenging climate conditions is
essential for agriculture because we can gain increased and environmentally
friendly production by reducing stress on cattle.
Heat shock proteins reveal the functions in the cells and handle their
protection under stress situations. Therefore, it is essential to highlight the
response mechanisms and genetics by which heat-stressed cattle survive under
hot climate conditions. The current review provides insight into different
genes, their functions and gene expression studies conducted in cattle under
heat stress conditions. Genetics and genomics play roles in livestock health,
as they will help the researchers understand the importance of heat shock proteins in livestock, especially in
dairy cattle. © 2023 Friends Science Publishers
Keywords: Environment;
Heat shock proteins; Gene expression; Adaptation; Heat stress response
Introduction
The necessities of people's life predominantly depend on
livestock such as cattle, buffalo, goats and sheep. We use them for meat,
dairy, leather, hair and other valuable products. However, differences in
temperature, precipitation, or greenhouse gases in the atmosphere decrease
animal production, reproduction and well-being (Thornton
and Pierre 2010). Therefore, livestock must adapt to challenging climate conditions (Berman 2011). In tropical, subtropical, and
dry regions, high atmospheric conditions are the primary reason for heat stress
(HS) and the risk of decreased animal production (Belhadj et al. 2016).
Heat stress is an environmental situation that causes the productive
temperature to exceed the optimum temperature of the animal's thermal neutral
zone (Hahn 1999). Therefore, the animal
must regulate metabolic rate, acclimation and fat layer to combat HS conditions
and control body temperature (Sejian et al. 2018). Moreover, animals
undergo increased dietary requirements and genetic competence enhancement to
meet the energy conversational process.
Noticeable
environmental conditions have adversely affected cattle's health overall,
especially in Pakistani cattle (Chaudhry
Qamar Uz Zaman 2017). Clean Green
Pakistan (CGP) is a flagship five-year campaign aiming to improve the
ecological conditions, hence improving the climate scenario of the country.
This program is essential to improve the stress conditions on cattle since
Pakistan is ranked in the 8th position as per the "Global
Climate Risk Index 2021" report by Germanwatch. According to a recent
ranking, Pakistan has dropped from 5th to 8th, but
livestock is still vulnerable to climate change (Eckstein
et al. 2021). HS, cold stress,
water availability, feed availability, water quality and disease spread
severely affect the livestock. Every organism has a built-in system to change
its physiological system to combat environmental changes, including cattle. One
medium is to combat the HS by producing more Heat shock proteins (HSPs) (Wang et al.
2017). HS causes protein misfolding in cells and HSPs, as molecular
chaperones, supervise the correct protein folding to maintain intracellular
homeostasis (Arrigo et al. 2005). Initially, HSPs were found in the salivary
gland cells of Drosophila due to heat shock treatment (Ritossa 1962), but later they were found in almost all organisms.
However, they are expressed whenever cells are exposed to a high temperature
above their optimum temperature. Moreover, these proteins may also produce when
an organism's cells are exposed to toxicity or any other imbalanced state,
lethal to cells, so these specific proteins are called stress proteins (DeRocher et al.
1991). There are different HSPs, including HSP40, HSP60, HSP70, HSP 90,
etc. Each protein plays a significant role during HS acclimation. For example,
HSP70 plays a vital role when the animal is under climate stress conditions,
and it has been studied that HSP70 is an ideal molecular marker that secures
the cells to counter heat shock exposure in varied livestock.
The current
review highlighted the importance of HS tolerance in cattle. Many research
discoveries show that Zebu cattle have high thermotolerance by regulating
several changes in the body, metabolic rates and gene expression. Therefore,
analyzing cattle's cellular responses to temperature stress, heat shock
response components and stress on animal’s bodies is essential for improving
local breeds for better production with many beneficial adaptabilities.
The impact of climate change on
cattle
Climate change is now considered a global issue, and
according to the WMO's report, there will be an increase of 3⁰C to 5⁰C in the
current century (Barriopedro et al. 2020). First, the HS
caused by climate change highly influences dairy cattle reproduction, growth,
feed intake, and disease risk (Rojas-Downing et al. 2017). Second, the
agriculture sector suffers considerable economic loss worldwide (Thornton et al.
2007). Consequently, to avoid these problems, several countries are
developing crossbreeding programs for cattle to withstand HS and increase the
quality of meat and milk production (Hoffmann
and Beate 2006). For example,
Pakistan has a variety of cattle, and some possess HS tolerance ability (Table
1).
The breeds of
heat-tolerant cattle can better survive in harsh climatic conditions than
non-tolerant ones. Some cattle undergo morphological changes in their body to
adapt to heat or cold conditions (Das et al. 2016). Along with
morphological changes in the body, cattle also undergo changes in its
physiological, behavioral, biochemical, molecular, and endocrine mechanisms
(Fig. 1). Usually, when an animal undergoes thermal stress, its behavior
is observed to change at first instinct. Later in the stress period, physiological
and other adaptation is observed in cattle. However, the cattle that exhibit
heat tolerance have low growth rates, milk production, meat production, and
reproductive efficacy. Thus, some effects of climate change are visible, but
some damage the animal's body internally (Fig. 2).
Essential genes
related to heat stress in cattle
HSPs are a group of proteins that play a crucial role in
response to environmental stress on the host (Ghosh
et al. 2018). Most family
members of HSP work as chaperones and initiate during stress conditions to
reshape the damaged cell proteins. Thus, the expression of HSPs is initiated
with the induction of heat shock factors (Fig. 3). The heat stress response
triggers the inactive HSP-HSF complex; this initiates the heat shock factors
(HSF) synthesis and converts it into an active form. Protein kinases form
trimmed HSF and transport it into the nucleus, where the trimmed HSF activates
the heat shock elements (HSE) and starts the HSP transcription, producing HSP
proteins. The final proteins are transported to the cytosol to perform different
functions, such as combining with stressed-denatured protein and forming a
refolded protein. Similarly, the translated HSP proteins can perform other
functions under stress conditions.
The HSP
family comprises many members (Table 2) and is found in almost all living
organisms, including cattle. The molecular weight in kilos Dalton is present
next to HSP's name (Moseley 1998). The
animal's genetic makeup plays a huge role in the development of thermo-tolerant
cattle, and scientists are focused on HSP markers and important miRNA to
prevent heat-induced stress and ensure thermo-tolerant cattle breeds such as
the Nekore breed (Hansen 2004). Some of
the important studies conducted on HSPs with respect to HS in cattle are
discussed below:
Heat shock
protein 10 (HSP10) is also known as chaperonin 10 (cpn10) and the HSPE1 gene
administrates its expression. The HSP10 act as a cofactor of HSP60 and is
usually expressed during an immune response (Böttinger
et al. 2015). Moreover, this
protein is also related to other vital body functions, such as cancer, pregnancy
and autoimmune inhibition.
HSP10 has also been found to be abundantly expressed
during summer and winter in cattle (Sahiwal and Tharparkar) and Buffalo
(Murrah) compared to spring (Kumar et al. 2015). The study used
PBMCs to evaluate the expression using quantitative real-time PCR. Gene
expression of HSPA1A and HSPA1B were significantly higher, followed by HSP10
and HSP60. Furthermore, the expression pattern of HSP10 was noticed to be
higher in buffalo than cattle, implying that buffalo can withstand harsh
environmental conditions and are better adaptive to climate stress.
Another
essential heat shock protein is HSP27 (heat shock protein beta-1) and the HSPB1
gene encodes it. The HSP27 is also associated with numerous functions,
including protein-controlling mechanisms, apoptosis inhibition,
thermoregulation, cell development mechanism, signal transduction and cell
differentiation (Nahleh et al. 2012).
Although most of the expression
analysis of HSP27 is done in skeletal
muscles, few studies have been conducted
to check the HSP as a biomarker in serum under heat stress conditions (Min et al.
2015). Therefore, the Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used
to test HSP27, HSP70 and HSP90 in serum and other parameters: insulin, leptin,
adiponectin, AMPK and HSF. After three weeks of stress, the samples were
selected and daily milk yield, dry matter intake, rectal temperature, and
respiratory rates were recorded. The average temperature-humidity index (THI)
was set to 81.7 to meet the heat stress conditions. Table 1: Cattle breeds
across Pakistan and their details (Khan et al. 2008)
Names |
Synonym |
Heat tolerance |
Utility |
Distribution |
Population Size |
Other Countries |
Achai |
N/A |
Yes |
Light draught and dairy |
KPK |
684 |
Afghanistan |
Bhagnari |
Nari |
Yes |
Heavy draught |
Baluchistan |
1027 |
Endemic |
Cholistani |
N/A |
Yes |
Dairy |
Punjab |
537 |
Endemic |
Dajal |
N/A |
No |
Medium draught |
Punjab |
72 |
Endemic |
Desi |
N/A |
No |
Dairy and draught |
All provinces |
11752 |
India |
Dhanni |
Pothwari |
No |
Medium draught |
Punjab |
1483 |
Endemic |
Gabrali |
N/A |
No |
Light draught and dairy |
KPK |
231 |
Afghanistan |
Hariana |
N/A |
No |
Draught |
Punjab |
Less than 1 |
India |
Hissar |
N/A |
No |
Draught |
Punjab |
Less than 1 |
India |
Kankrai |
N/A |
No |
Medium draught |
Punjab and Sindh |
273 |
India |
Lohani |
N/A |
No |
Light draught |
KPK and Punjab |
560 |
Endemic |
Red Sindhi |
Sindhi/Malir |
Yes |
Dairy |
Sindh and Baluchistan |
3032 |
Endemic |
Rojhan |
N/A |
No |
Light draught |
Punjab |
376 |
Endemic |
Sahiwal |
Montgomery/Lola |
Yes |
Dairy |
Punjab |
2753 |
India, Kenya, Australia, and others |
Thari |
Tharparker/ Grey Sindhi |
Yes |
Medium draught and dairy |
Sindh |
1783 |
India |
Table 2: List of important heat stress genes in cattle
Genes |
Location |
Function |
Reference |
ANTXR2 |
Plasma
membrane |
Transmembrane signaling receptor activity |
(Flori et al. 2019) |
BCL2 |
Cytoplasm |
Ubiquitous inhibitor
of cell death |
(Corazzin et al. 2020) |
BHLHE41 |
Nucleus |
Controls the circadian
rhythm and cell differentiation |
(Jiang et al. 2019; Uchimura et al. 2019) |
CDKN1B |
Cytoplasm |
Regulator of cell cycle progression |
(Sigdel et al. 2019) |
E2F8 |
Nucleus |
Regulation of genes is
required for progression through the cell cycle |
(Jiang et al. 2019; Uchimura et al. 2019) |
FBXO44 |
Cytosol |
Functions in
phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitination |
(Jiang et al. 2019; Uchimura et al. 2019) |
GATAD2B |
Nucleoplasm |
Represses gene
expression by deacetylating methylated nucleosomes |
(Jiang et al. 2019) |
GLUT-1 |
Plasma membrane |
Responsible for
constitutive or basal glucose uptake |
(Baumgard and Jr Robert 2013) |
HSF1 |
Nucleus and Cytoplasm |
Acts as a binder to
HSEs and activates HSP gene transcription |
(Khan et al. 2020; Collier et al. 2008; Rong et al. 2019; Kumar et al.
2015; Min et al. 2015) |
HSP 10 |
Mitochondria |
Chaperone,
immunomodulation and cell proliferation and differentiation |
(Jia et al. 2011; Kumar et al. 2015) |
HSP 20 |
Plasma
membrane |
These protein
chaperones protect other various proteins against denaturation by heat and
aggregation. |
(Kumar et al. 2017) |
HSP27 |
Cytosol |
Maintenance of muscle
structure and function |
(Kammoun et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2010; Min et al.
2015; Archana et al. 2017) |
HSP 40 |
Cytosol |
Act as a cofactor of
other proteins, especially HSP70 |
(Danwattananusorn
et al. 2011) |
HSP 60 |
Mitochondria |
Protein homeostasis |
(Alyamani 2020;
Singh et al. 2018; Kumar et al. 2015) |
HSP 70 |
Cytoplasm |
Protein folding and
increased production because of stress or starvation |
(Maibam et al. 2017; Banerjee et al. 2014; Bharati et al. 2017; Khan et al. 2020; Min et al.
2015; Archana et al. 2017) |
HSP 90 |
Cytoplasm |
Controls the cell
cycle and survival, hormonal activity, and other various signaling pathways |
(Aritonang et al. 2017; Deb et al. 2014; Hahn 1999; Khan et
al. 2020; Kumar et al. 2015;
Min et al. 2015; Archana et al. 2017) |
LEF1 |
Nucleus |
Hair cell differentiation and follicle morphogenesis |
(Gao et al. 2017; Flori et al. 2019) |
MAPK |
Cytosol |
Activates response to
excitotoxic stress |
(Sigdel et al. 2019) |
PRLR |
Plasma membrane |
Development of sleek
hair in cattle |
(Hansen 2020) |
RAB39B |
Plasma membrane |
Involved in vesicular
trafficking |
(Jiang et al. 2019) |
TCF7 |
Nucleus |
Transcriptional
activator involved in T-cell lymphocyte differentiation |
(Flori et al. 2019) |
UBE2I |
Nucleus |
Targets abnormal or
short-lived proteins for degradation |
(Jiang et al. 2019) |
During this THI, the rectal temperature and respiratory
rates rose notably, and the serum concentration of HSF, HSP27, HSP70 and HSP90
was higher. This result shows that HSP is a valuable indicator of animal heat
stress and can be used as a biomarker in dairy cows' adaptation to harsh
environments.
Blood
parameters, serum T3, cortisol and HSPs (HSP27, HSP70 and HSP90) levels were
tested in a similar study in Hanwoo Steer (Korean cattle) under heat stress
conditions (Baek et al. 2019). Also, the mRNA expression studied of HSPs
genes in the liver tissue of cattle. Two-level conditions of THI were
administrated to cattle in respiratory chambers. The first level (control) was
maintained at thermoneutral conditions (THI=64); in the second level, a THI of
87 was maintained to create harsh environmental conditions for cattle. As
expected, the cattle's body temperature, rectal temperature, and respiratory
rate were markedly raised during harsh environmental conditions. The feed
intake and body weight were also recorded, which decreased during HS than
control conditions. There was only increased HSP expression and concentration
during high THI. The upregulation of HSP27's expression was 3.1- and 6.6-fold
change after 3 and 6 days, respectively. Similarly, the fold change increase in
HSP90 was 2.3-fold and 5.6 fold after 3 and 6 days, respectively. The highest
increase in
Fig. 1: Cattle response to heat stress and adaptation
Fig. 2: External and internal heat stress effects on cattle's body
Fig. 3: HSP Pathway activation in heat stress conditions
expression was found in HSP70, 9.2 and 16.7 folds after
3 and 6 days, respectively. The increased expression of HSPs in Hanwoo cattle
indicates that the cattle are better adapted to heat stress conditions.
HSP40 is also known as DnaJ Heat Shock Protein Family
(Hsp40) Member A1 because of its association with HSPA8 regulation, J-domain
facilitator and binding ability to the N-terminal of the ATPase domain (Minami et al.
1996). It is also important in chaperone function and repairing damaged
proteins due to stress conditions (Hartl and Manajit 2002). In addition, there has been a
notable ~7-fold increase in ATPase activity in the presence of HSP40. This
notable increase allows proper renaturation of proteins which thermally denatured
conditions may cause.
The
C-terminal and N-terminal regions of HSP40 have been explored to find any
association with heat adaptation (Ajayi et al. 2018). Mutations in these
regions can disrupt the chaperone's functions under cellular stress. The study
was conducted on cattle and yak from Nigeria, Pakistan and the USA. The
N-terminal region of Asian, African, and USA breeds showed 11, 9 and 2
haplotypes, respectively, whereas the C-terminal region was conserved in all
the studied animals. The sequence analysis of the N-terminal (J domain)
detected five polymorphic loci. A total of three mutations occurred in exon 2
of all three breeds, while the remaining mutations occurred in exon 3 of
African and Asian cattle breeds only. The difference in polymorphic loci of
American cattle may be because of its moderate environmental conditions,
whereas the other two cattle breeds experience tropical environments. It is
noteworthy that the study cannot conclude whether the mutations are because of any
environmental stress conditions, but further investigation of the HSP40 gene
can solve this mystery.
Animal blood
regulation can be effectively studied to examine the physiological adaptation
to environmental stress. Such a study was conducted on the blood leukocytes of
Holstein-Friesian (HF), Sahiwal cattle and Murrah buffaloes (Kishore et al.
2014). The study determined the role of HSPs (HSP40, HSP60, HSP70, and
HSP90) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) during high temperatures
(~42⁰C). PBMCs of HF were more
affected by heat shock treatment and caused sudden heat loss as compared to
other breeds. The qRT-PCR results showed a significant increase in the
expression of HSP70 and HSP60. However, the expression levels of these genes
varied, as buffalo had the highest expression of HSPs than cattle.
The HSP40
differential expression has been investigated in bovine embryos: degenerates
and blastocysts (Zhang et al. 2011). The study tested the expression of HSP40 as it
plays a significant role in the assembly of protein when a cell is under
different stress conditions. During bovine embryo development, the degenerate
embryos are under stress, which may disturb protein homeostasis; thus, the
expression of HSPs was investigated in bovine to find any helpful information.
The expression of HSP40 was significantly high in degenerate embryos, up to an
average of 7.6-fold compared to blastocysts. The upregulation of the gene
confirms its vital role in maintaining proteostasis in a stressful environment.
HSP60 is another essential heat shock protein and is
known as a chaperonin. The protein translocates, folds and assembles different
native proteins in various organisms under stress conditions (Langer and Walter 1990). The most important aspect is that
the HSP60 protein is an intra-mitochondrial molecule that assists in protein
folding and prevents misfolding during HS conditions.
The change in
the expression of HSP60 and GLUT-1 was investigated in buffaloes (Chilika (CH),
Paralakhemundi (PM) and Murrah (MU)) during moderate and high THI (Singh et al.
2018). The study aimed to determine if the subjects (having dark skin
colors and poor sweat glands) are better adapted to heat stress conditions and
high milk productivity (lactose synthesis from glucose) using qPCR. Previously,
GLUT-1 has also been associated with heat stress in cattle (Baumgard and Jr Robert 2013). The results show no significant increase in the relative
expression of HSP60 in all breeds, whereas GLUT-1 showed high expression in MU
(3.53-folds) compared to PM and a 4.41-fold increase compared to CH at moderate
THI. GLUT-1 expression results may be valuable since the production of milk is
predominantly affected when animals undergo harsh environmental conditions.
The negative
effect of HS also damages fetal development in the bovine uterus. Therefore,
the mRNA expression of HSPs (HSP27, HSP60, HSP70 and HSP90) has been studied in
uterine endometrial tissues of Holstein dairy cows in summer (avg. THI=73) and
winter (avg. THI=42.4) (Bai et al. 2020). The qPCR analysis showed lower mRNA expression
(p < .05) of all HSPs (except HSP70) during summer as compared to winter.
The lower expression of HSPs may be due to variations in heat stress conditions
in vitro and in vivo systems. Further studies on protein expression will help
comprehend HSPs' role under heat stress in bovine uterine endometrial tissues.
HSP70 is an essential heat shock protein produced in
almost all organisms and is functional in multiple cells. Its vital role is to
interact with peptide segments and folded proteins to cause intense folding and
aggregation during heat and chemical stress.
Several novel
polymorphisms have been detected in the untranslated region (UTR) and coding
region of HSP70 (Sodhi et al. 2013). The Indian Zebu cattle (indicine and taurine)
and four riverine buffalo (bubaline) were studied to find polymorphism in the
tropical adaptation of these subjects. The coding region of HSP70 was similar
in cattle and buffalo. In contrast, there was a ~200 nucleotide increase in the
UTR's length of buffalo. A total of 50 SNPs and 4 INDELs were detected in
cattle (taurine and indicine) and buffalo. A total of 15 SNPs (6 at
5′flanking region and 9 in the coding region) were detected among buffalo
breeds, while the 3′-UTR of cattle and buffalo were monomorphic. The
results show some novel polymorphism in potential transcription factor binding
domains and microsatellites, which may be used as a molecular marker for
thermotolerance.
The qPCR
analysis of mRNA expression in Tharparkar cattle during HS shows a significant
increase in the HSP70 gene (Bharati et al. 2017). The animals were
kept for 50 days under thermal conditions. The HSP70 expression was found
significantly higher after 15 days of heat exposure and decreased later. The
expression gradually increased again on the 32nd day, suggesting a
two-level alarm system for double protection against heat stress conditions.
Similarly, the
expression levels of various HSP70 genes (HSP70.1, HSP70.2 and HSP70.8) have
been investigated under different seasonal conditions (winter, summer and
spring) in the skin of Zebu (Tharparkar) and crossbreed (Karan Fries) cattle (Maibam et al.
2017). The qPCR analysis revealed the gene expression of constitutive
(HSP70.8) and inducible (HSP70.1 and HSP70.2) higher in summer than in winter
and spring. The HSP gene expression was 4.92±0.53 in Tharparkar and 3.01±0.30
in Karan Fries during summer. The inducible HSP gene expression was 6.86±0.30
and 4.01±0.18 in Karan Fries and Tharparkar during summer. The skin and rectal
temperature increased during summer in both subjects. The higher expression of
HSP70 during summer in cattle shows its potential role during heat stress
conditions.
The role of HSP90 has been widely studied and is
recognized as a chaperone and assists in folding and stabilizing other proteins
remarkably during heat stress conditions. It also plays a vital role in
degrading other proteins (Blagg and Timothy 2006). The HSP90 is also produced in cells exposed to
other stress and heat, such as dehydration (Hahn et al. 2011).
In an interesting study, the gene expression of
HSP90 was compared in vitro and under environmental heat stress (37–45C) in
Sahiwal and Friswal cattle (Deb et al. 2014). The cattle's PBMC
were exposed to heat for one hour at 42°C and tested for HSP90 relative
expression along with peak summer sessions. A higher expression level of HSP90
was observed in Sahiwal (3.29 ± 0.49) than in Friswal (2.11 ± 0.38) cattle
during in vitro heat stress. Similarly, protein concentration was significantly
higher in Sahiwal (4.13 ± 0.48 ng/mL) than in Friswal (2.98 ± 0.46 ng/mL).
Furthermore, during peak summer environmental temperatures (at 45°C), the
relative expression of Sahiwal (3.67 ± 2.99) was higher than the Friswal (2.98
± 2.52) cattle breed. Hence, this shows that Sahiwal cattle adapt more to heat
stress than Friswal under in vitro and environmental heat stress conditions.
(Pires et al. 2019) studied the HSPs (HSP60, HSP70 and HSP90)
relative expression, physiological behavior (rectal temperature (RT), heart
rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), skin temperature (ST)) and cortisol
concentration in Brazilian dual-purpose cattle (Nelore and Caracu) during HS.
The three HS conditions were direct sun contact (THI = 90.79), under shade (THI
= 82.17)
and morning (THI = 82.67).
The Caracu cattle maintained the physiological response (RT = 40.40, HR = 114,
RR = 76 and ST = 47) in all conditions compared to Nelore (RT = 39.90, HR = 110,
RR = 70 and ST = 44.36). The mean cortisol level was 23.74 ng/mL and
18.52 ng/mL in Caracu and Nelore, respectively. The mean relative
expression of HSP60, HSP70 and HSP90 in Caracu was 2.99, 1.93 and 1.18,
respectively. Contrastingly, the mean relative expression was 2.76 (HSP60),
1.98 (HSP70) and 1.55 (HSP90) in Nelore. The monthly relative expression of
HSP60 showed higher expression during October and February in both breeds,
whereas HSP70 had higher expression in December and lowest in February in both
breeds. The HSP90 showed higher expression during October and December. In
conclusion, the study identified a unique pattern of responses to heat stress
in both breeds and their adaptation to tropical climates.
Conclusion
This review highlighted multiple studies conducted to
investigate the HSP's role in cattle.
The expression level of these genes depends on environmental conditions and
varies in different breeds. The HSPs exhibit a unique physiological function in
stress conditions and are activated by the HSP activation factors that start their
transcription and translation. The studies on the genetics of HS highlight
another technique, gene editing, which will provide prospects of decreasing the
heat stress on cattle and make them heat tolerant to harsh environmental
conditions.
Furthermore, the economic loss because of climate change and its
effect on heat stress is very high. Breeding programs for heat-tolerant cattle can be adjusted to
accelerate and improve environmental conditions
through proper management, reducing global warming and minimizing the
greenhouse effect in the environment. Since controlling the environment is not
a single-handed task, different organizations and institutes should collaborate
and find valuable solutions. Working in
this manner will provide high valued input to tackle the global problem of heat
stress in cattle.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to Higher Education
Commission, Islamabad-Pakistan for their support under NRPU-4485 grant to work
on cattle heat tolerance at the Virtual University of Pakistan.
Author Contributions
TH conceived the idea, QRQ and TH drafted and
prepared the manuscript, AW and TH performed the critical revision of the
article. MEB provided the critical insight and revisions. All authors gave
necessary suggestions, revised and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Data Availability
Not applicable.
Ethics Approval
Not applicable.
References
Ajayi, O Oyeyemi, OP
Sunday, F Marcos De Donato, AK Waqas, H Tanveer, EB Masroor, GI Ikhide, NT
Bolaji (2018). Genetic variation in N-and C-terminal regions of bovine DNAJA1
heat shock protein gene in African, Asian and American cattle. J Genom 6:1–8
Alyamani Dr (2020).
Impact various seasons on expression patterns HSP60 and physiological
parameters. J Dairy Vet Anim Res 9:1‒4
Archana PR, J
Aleena, P Pragna, MK Vidya, APA Niyas, M Bagath, G Krishnan, A Manimaran, V
Beena, EK Kurien (2017). Role of heat shock proteins in livestock adaptation to
heat stress. J Dairy Vet Anim Res
5:00127
Aritonang SB, Y
Ratna, Abinawanto, M Imron, A Bowolaksono (2017). Effect of thermal stress on
HSP90 expression of Bali cattle in Barru district, South Sulawesi. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 030104. AIP Publishing LLC
Arrigo A-P, V Sophie,
C Sylvain, F Wance, K-R Carole, D-L Chantal (2005). Hsp27 consolidates
intracellular redox homeostasis by upholding glutathione in its reduced form
and by decreasing iron intracellular levels. Antioxidants Redox Signal 7:414‒22
Baek Y-C, K Minseok, J Jin-Young, O
Young-Kyoon, L Sung-Dae, L Yoo-Kyung, J Sang-Yun, C Hyuck (2019). Effects of
short-term acute heat stress on physiological responses and heat shock proteins
of Hanwoo steer (Korean cattle). J Anim Reprod
Biotechnol 34:173‒82
Bai H, U Haruka, K
Manabu, M Tomohiro, F Eri, Y Yojiro, Y Naoto, K Heejin, T Masashi (2020).
Effect of summer heat stress on gene expression in bovine uterine endometrial
tissues. Anim Sci J 91:e13474
Banerjee D, CU
Ramesh, BC Umesh, K Ravindra, S Sohanvir, P Shamik, M Ayan, KD Tapan, D
Sachinandan (2014). Seasonal variation in expression pattern of genes under
HSP70. Cell Stress Chaperones 19:401‒08
Barriopedro C,
David, PM Sousa, RM Trigo, HR García, AM Ramos (2020). The exceptional Iberian
heatwave of summer 2018. Bull Amer Meteorol
Soc 101:S29‒S33
Baumgard LH, PR Jr Robert
(2013). Effects of heat stress on postabsorptive metabolism and energetics. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 1:311‒37
Belhadj SI, T Najar,
G Abdeljelil, A Manef (2016). Heat stress effects on livestock: Molecular,
cellular and metabolic aspects, a review. J
Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 100:401‒12
Berman A (2011).
Invited review: Are adaptations present to support dairy cattle productivity in
warm climates? J Dairy Sci 94:2147‒58
Bharati J, SS Dangi,
VS Chouhan, SR Mishra, MK Bharti, V Verma, O Shankar, VP Yadav, K Das, A Paul
(2017). Expression dynamics of HSP70 during chronic heat stress in Tharparkar
cattle. Intl J Biometeorol 61:1017‒27
Blagg BSJ, DK
Timothy (2006). Hsp90 inhibitors: Small molecules that transform the Hsp90
protein folding machinery into a catalyst for protein degradation. Med Res Rev 26:310‒38
Böttinger L, O Silke,
G Bernard, R Sabine, W Bettina, B Thomas (2015). Mitochondrial heat shock
protein (Hsp) 70 and Hsp10 cooperate in the formation of Hsp60 complexes. J Biol Chem 290:11611‒22
Chaudhry Qamar Uz
Zaman (2017). Climate change profile of
Pakistan. Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines
Collier RJ, JL
Collier, RP Rhoads, LH Baumgard (2008). Invited review: Genes involved in the
bovine heat stress response. J Dairy Sci 91:445‒54
Corazzin M, S Elena,
L Giovanna, R Alberto, F Vinicius, BF Da, P Edi (2020). Effect of Heat Stress
on Dairy Cow performance and on expression of protein metabolism genes in
mammary cells. Animals 10:2124
Danwattananusorn T, FF
Fernand, S Aiko, K Hidehiro, A Takashi, N Reiko, H Ikuo (2011). Molecular
characterization and expression analysis of heat shock proteins 40, 70 and 90
from kuruma shrimp Marsupenaeus japonicus. Fish
Sci 77:929‒37
Das R, S Lalrengpuii,
V Nishant, B Pranay, S Jnyanashree (2016). Impact of heat stress on health and
performance of dairy animals: A review. Vet
World 9:260
Deb R, S Basavaraj,
S Umesh, K Sushil, S Rani, G Sengar, S Arjava (2014). Effect of heat stress on
the expression profile of Hsp90 among Sahiwal (Bos indicus) and Frieswal (Bos
indicus × Bos taurus) breed of cattle: A comparative study. Genetic 536:435‒40
DeRocher AE, WH
Kenneth, ML Lisa, V Elizabeth (1991). Expression of a conserved family of
cytoplasmic low molecular weight heat shock proteins during heat stress and
recovery. Plant Physiol 96:1038‒1047
Eckstein D, K Vera,
S Laura (2021). Global climate risk index 2021. Germanwatch, Bonn, Germany
Flori L, M-G Katayoun, A Véronique, A
Abdelillah, B Ismaïl, B Nadjet, C François, C Sara, C Roberta, DA Coeur, C
Corinne, D Juan-Vicente, E-B Ahmed, H Georgia, J Emmanuelle, L Vincenzo, L Anne,
L Philippe, L Christina, M Caroline, M Amparo, M Salvatore, M Dalal, M
Charles-Henri, O Mona-Abdelzaher, P Olivier, P Baldassare, R Clementina, S-M
Nadhira, S Tiziana, S Guilhem, T Sophie, T Dimitrios, L Denis, G Mathieu (2019).
A genomic map of climate adaptation in Mediterranean cattle breeds. Mol Ecol 28:1009‒1029
Gao Y, G Mathieu, D
Xiangdong, Z Hao, W Yachun, W Xi, MDO Faruque, L Junya, Y Shaohui, G Xiao (2017).
Species composition and environmental adaptation of indigenous Chinese cattle. Sci Reports 7:1‒14
Ghosh S, S Poulami,
B Priyanka, M Sushweta, CS Parames (2018). Role of heat shock proteins in
oxidative stress and stress tolerance. Heat
Shock Proteins Stress 109‒126
Hahn A, B Daniela, S
Enrico, S Klaus-Dieter (2011). Crosstalk between Hsp90 and Hsp70 chaperones and
heat stress transcription factors in tomato. Plant Cell 23:741‒755
Hahn GL (1999).
Dynamic responses of cattle to thermal heat loads. J Anim Sci 77:10‒20
Hansen PJ (2020).
Prospects for gene introgression or gene editing as a strategy for reduction of
the impact of heat stress on production and reproduction in cattle. Theriogenology 154:190‒202
Hansen PJ (2004).
Physiological and cellular adaptations of zebu cattle to thermal stress. Anim Reprod Sci 82:349‒60
Hartl FU, H-H
Manajit (2002). Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: From nascent chain to
folded protein. Science 295:1852‒1858
Hoffmann I, S Beate (2006).
Animal Genetic Resources-time to Worry. Livestock Report 2006, FAO, Rome, Italy
Jia H, IH Amadou, H
Liang, C Wenqian, L Jing, H Bo (2011). Heat shock protein 10 (Hsp10) in
immune-related diseases: One coin, two sides. Intl J Biochem Mol Biol 2:47
Jiang Z, FA Diaz, EJ
Gutierrez, BA Foster, PT Hardin, KR Bondioli (2019). 123 Effect of heat stress
on oocyte developmental competence and global gene expression dynamics in Bos
taurus crossbred beef cows. Reprod Fert Dev
31:187
Kammoun M, P
Brigitte, H-B Joëlle, C-M Isabelle (2013). A network-based approach for
predicting Hsp27 knock-out targets in mouse skeletal muscles. Comput Structural Biotechnol J 6:e201303008
Khan, M Sajjad, Z
Rehman, AK Muqarrab, A Sohail (2008). Genetic resources and diversity in Pakistani
cattle. Pak Vet J 28:95‒102
Khan RIN, SA Ranjan,
MW Akram, PM Ranjan, H Neelima, K Shakti, G Smita, S Shwetha, S Archana, V
Anshul (2020). HSPs, ubiquitins and antioxidants aid in heat tolerance in
Tharparkar indicine cattle. BioRxiv doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.09.031153
Kishore A, S Monika,
K Parvesh, AK Mohanty, DK Sadana, K Neha, K Khate, S Umesh, RS Kataria, M
Mukesh (2014). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells: A potential cellular system
to understand differential heat shock response across native cattle (Bos
indicus), exotic cattle (Bos taurus), and riverine buffaloes (Bubalus
bubalis) of India. Cell Stress
Chaperones 19:613‒621
Kumar A, A Syma, TS Goud,
G Anita, SV Singh, BR Yadav, RC Upadhyay (2015). Expression profiling of major heat
shock protein genes during different seasons in cattle (Bos indicus) and
buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) under tropical climatic condition. J Therm Biol 51:55‒64
Kumar R, ID Gupta, V
Archana, K Ragini, V Nishant (2017). Molecular characterization and SNP identification
in HSPB6 gene in Karan Fries (Bos taurus × Bos indicus) cattle. Trop Anim Health Prod 49:1059‒1063
Langer T, N Walter (1990).
Heat shock proteins hsp60 and hsp70: Their roles in folding, assembly and
membrane translocation of proteins. Curr
Topics Microbiol Immunol 3:30
Liu J, Z Dongyun, M
Xiaoyi, X Qing, Y Yonghui, Z Zhenghong, G Wei, Z Xuewei, C Jia, Y Qing (2010).
p27 suppresses arsenite-induced Hsp27/Hsp70 expression through inhibiting
JNK2/c-Jun-and HSF-1-dependent pathways. J
Biol Chem 285:26058‒26065
Maibam U, OK Hooda,
PS Sharma, AK Mohanty, SV Singh, RC Upadhyay (2017). Expression of HSP70 genes
in skin of zebu (Tharparkar) and crossbred (Karan Fries) cattle during
different seasons under tropical climatic conditions. J Therm Biol 63:58‒64
Min L, C Jian-bo, S
Bao-lu, Y Hong-jian, Z Nan, W Jia-qi (2015). Effects of heat stress on serum
insulin, adipokines, AMP-activated protein kinase, and heat shock signal
molecules in dairy cows. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci
b, 16:541‒548
Minami Y, H Jörg, O
Kenzo, H Franz-Ulrich (1996). Regulation of the heat-shock protein 70 reaction
cycle by the mammalian DnaJ homolog, Hsp40. J
Biol Chem 271:19617‒19624
Moseley PL (1998).
Heat shock proteins and the inflammatory response. Ann NY Acad Sci 856:206‒213
Nahleh Z, A Tfayli, A
Najm, A El Sayed, Z Nahle (2012). Heat shock proteins in cancer: Targeting the
‘chaperones’. Future Med Chem 4:927‒935
Pires BV, NB
Stafuzza, SBGPNP Lima, JA Negrão, CCP Paz (2019). Differential expression of
heat shock protein genes associated with heat stress in Nelore and Caracu beef
cattle. Livest Sci 230:103839
Ritossa F (1962). A
new puffing pattern induced by temperature shock and DNP in Drosophila. Experientia 18:571‒573
Rojas-Downing, M
Melissa, AP Nejadhashemi, H Timothy, AW Sean (2017). Climate change and livestock:
Impacts, adaptation and mitigation. Climate
Risk Manage 16:145‒163
Rong Y, Z Mingfei, G
Xiwen, Q Kaixing, L Jianyong, Z Jicai, C Hong, H Bizhi, L Chuzhao (2019).
Association of HSF1 Genetic Variation with Heat Tolerance in Chinese Cattle. Animals 9:1027
Sejian V, R Bhatta,
JB Gaughan, FR Dunshea, N Lacetera (2018). Adaptation of animals to heat stress.
Animal 12:s431‒s444
Sigdel A, A-A Rostam,
A Ignacio, P Francisco (2019). Whole genome mapping reveals novel genes and
pathways involved in milk production under heat stress in US Holstein cows. Front Genet 10:928
Singh R, C Rajesh,
SK Mishra, G Ankita, V Vikas, SK Niranjan, KR Singh (2018). Comparative
expression profiling of heat-stress tolerance associated HSP60 and GLUT-1 genes
in Indian buffaloes. Ind J Dairy Sci
71:183‒186
Sodhi M, M Mukesh, A
Kishore, BP Mishra, RS Kataria, BK Joshi (2013). Novel polymorphisms in UTR and
coding region of inducible heat shock protein 70.1 gene in tropically adapted
Indian zebu cattle (Bos indicus) and riverine buffalo (Bubalus
bubalis). Genetic 527:606‒615
Thornton PK, JG
Pierre (2010). Climate change and the growth of the livestock sector in
developing countries. Mitigation Adaptation
Strategies Global Change 15:169‒184
Thornton PK, TH Mario,
HA Freeman, MA Okeyo, JEO Rege, GJ Peter, JM John (2007). Vulnerability,
climate change and livestock-opportunities and challenges for the poor. J Semi-Arid Trop Agric Res 4:1–23
Uchimura T, H Seiji,
Y Takashi, K Yasuhiro, K Takeshi (2019). Involvement of heat shock proteins on
the transcriptional regulation of corticotropin-releasing hormone in medaka. Front Endocrinol 10:529
Wang X, J Dabang, L
Xianmei (2017). Future extreme climate changes linked to global warming
intensity. Sci Bull 62:1673‒1680
Zhang B, F Peñagaricano, A Driver, H Chen, H Khatib
(2011). Differential expression of heat shock protein genes and their splice
variants in bovine preimplantation embryos. J
Dairy Sci 94:4174‒4182